Sunday, September 6, 2009

Women's eNews: Cover Story: U.N. Tackles Universal Problem for Women: Divorce

Women the world over lose out financially in divorce, say custodians of the U.N. treaty on women's rights, Theresa Braine reports today. That's why they are reviewing what CEDAW says on the matter, with a new general recommendation expected next year.

Story follows announcements.

A podcast of Women's eNews' enormously popular Cheers and Jeers column is now posted on the Women's eNews Web site:

Does someone send you Women's eNews? Please help us grow and get your own free subscription today at

Here's today's update:


U.N. Tackles Universal Problem for Women: Divorce

By Theresa Braine
WeNews correspondent

Ruth Halperin-Kaddari

UNITED NATIONS (WOMENSENEWS)--Guardians of the U.N.'s treaty on women's rights have begun to address one of the most daunting challenges for women the world over: financially surviving divorce.

Setting international standards on this issue strikes at the core of cultural identity and even into people's personal sense of self, says Marsha Freeman, a member of the committee currently reviewing the treaty's position on divorce. And that, she says, is "the hardest place to make these changes."

Freeman is the director of International Women's Rights Action Watch, a human rights group based at the University of Minnesota Law School that promotes worldwide recognition of the tenets of the U.N. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, or CEDAW. She is also a member of the CEDAW working group that is studying the issue of divorce and its economic consequences for women.

Freeman helped draft the statement given by Ruth Halperin-Kaddari, vice president of the U.N. committee overseeing implementation of CEDAW, during the most recent review session on CEDAW, which took place from July 20 through August 7 this summer. During the meeting the convention began airing current research and findings on the economic consequences of divorce on women.

While revising the treaty's criterion for divorce won't be easy, CEDAW overseers consider it necessary. That's because although women the world over lead vastly different lives, most of them invariably lose out financially in divorce.

States party reports, nongovernmental organizations and the U.N.'s own research has determined over the years that in many countries laws and customs do not support either women's accumulation of property during marriage or equal division of marital property upon divorce, says Freeman.

Growing Concern

"The economic consequences of divorce have been of growing concern to social scientists and policy makers," said Halperin-Kaddari in her statement.

Halperin-Kaddari, the main presenter before the CEDAW committee, said research in industrialized countries has demonstrated that while men usually experience minimal income losses after divorce, most women experience a substantial decline in household income and an increased dependence on social welfare where it is available. "Throughout the world, female-headed households are the most likely to be poor," she said.

Women's median income drops by 20 percent or so in the United States and 24 percent in the European Union, studies show. But the financial impact on men isn't as drastic. According to 1996 U.S. Census data, 21 percent of recently divorced women were living below the poverty line, while only 9 percent of men were.

In many parts of the world the penalty is far worse, with women cast out of their in-laws' homes with nothing but the clothes on their backs.

Halperin-Kaddari told Women's eNews that the CEDAW committee will continue collecting information on legal issues and data on the situation of women around the world after such family relations are dissolved.

Based on this and other material, the committee next year will issue a new general recommendation that creates a global standard that gives divorcing women a fair economic shake.

CEDAW Silent on Aspects of Divorce

Adopted in 1994, CEDAW's current text addresses the social and legal aspects of a woman's right to choose a spouse and enter freely into marriage but does not delve into family life power structures or the economic consequences of divorce for women. The treaty grants women and men the "same rights and responsibilities during marriage and at its dissolution" and touches on divorce's aftermath, but it does not get specific about how to lessen the economic impact on women.

The committee has said that any new recommendation will take into account the effect of globalization and development on family relations and divorce.

Halperin-Kaddari said the goal is to set up a framework that can guide CEDAW member countries to create "an egalitarian legal regime under which the economic benefits of marriage and the costs and economic consequences of marital breakdown are equally borne by men and women."

The recommendations aren't binding, but countries can use them as a guide in dealing with issues related to divorce and dissolution of the family unit.

A few nongovernmental organizations and advocacy groups had their say as well.

Women Often Give Up Claims

Laurel Eisner, executive director of the New York City nonprofit Sanctuary for Families, noted that in the United States women often opt for an uncontested divorce, giving up their claim to property, because it is quicker to file a no-contest divorce that seeks nothing but the dissolution of the marriage. Such women may want a quick exit because it can help free them from an abusive relationship or avoid a costly legal battle, Eisner told Women's eNews.

Women often don't know how to safeguard their rights, nor can they circumvent corruption that's built into the legal and judicial professions, said Silvia Pimentel, a CEDAW committee member from Brazil.

Pimentel said that Brazil and other Latin American countries have passed a number of laws that benefit women. One example is Chile's legalization of divorce in 2004.

But she said judges and lawyers don't necessarily respect CEDAW nondiscrimination principles when it comes to putting the laws into practice.

"They always find ways of perpetuating stereotypes of women's inferiority," Pimentel said. And this means that women are often not given their fair share of assets or financial provisions for children in their custody.

Theresa Braine is a freelance journalist based in New York City.

Women's eNews welcomes your comments. E-mail us at

Related Stories

Naela Gabr, CEDAW chairperson, at the 44th session U.N. to Japan, Switzerland: Improve Rights Record
Stephanie Bruker Ex-Husband Appeals Jewish-Divorce Landmark Ruling
A couple walks on Qasr Al Nil Bridge Egyptian Women See Divorce as Religious Right
Alicia Quinonez Bustamante Chilean Women Celebrate Gaining Right to Divorce

For more information:

International Women's Rights Action Watch

Full CEDAW treaty text

General Recommendation No. 21, 1994 addendum to CEDAW that expands on family and marriage

Note: Women's eNews is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites and the contents of Web pages we link to may change without notice.

Please donate now by going to:

Or donate by check made out to:

Women's eNews

and Mail it to:

Women's eNews 6 Barclay Street, Sixth floor New York, NY 10007

Copyright 2009 Women's eNews. The information contained in this Women's eNews report may--with the prior written authorization of Women's eNews--be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed. To obtain permission, go to and provide the publication or broadcast date and the name of the newspaper, magazine, radio or television station, cable network, Web site, newsletter or list serve where it will be replicated. Please include the approximate size of the audience you intend to reach. Answers to your most frequently asked questions about permissions to reprint or repost Women's eNews content are available here:

Women's eNews is a nonprofit independent news service covering issues of concern to women and their allies. Women's eNews is supported by our readers; reprints and licensing fees; and foundations. Who Funds Us

We receive financial support from our readers, private donors, events, commercial publications that republish our material and from the following foundations. * The Bydale Foundation * The Carnegie Corporation of New York * The Charles Lawrence Keith & Clara S. Miller Foundation * The Ford Foundation * The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation * The Barbara Lee Family Foundation * The Livingry Fund of the Tides Foundation * Mary Kay Inc. * The McCormick Foundation * The Ms. Foundation * The Open Society Institute * The Rockefeller Brothers Fund * The Rockefeller Family Fund * The Sister Fund * The Starry Night Fund of Tides Foundation * The United Nations Foundation * The Waitt Institute for Violence Prevention * The W.K. Kellogg Foundation * Working Assets The donations from readers are critical to our success. They are an important measure that we are serving our audience--the yardstick that our foundation supporters will measure us by. Donate now by going to

Women's eNews subscribers may select whether to receive a daily full text, daily summary or weekly summary. To change your email address, send mail to To change the frequency of your mail or to cancel your subscription, send a message to Member Services ( or use our online form:

No comments: